T.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE LONELL ROBERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01724-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED

SECOND WATCH SGT., et al., (ECF No. 56) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

18 (ECF No. 63) 19 Plaintiff Clarence Lonell Roberson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 22 Before the Court is Defendants Gonzalez and K. Ga’s1 (“Defendants”) motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 23 the Prison Litigation Reform Act. (ECF No. 56.) The matter was referred to the undersigned 24 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 302(c)(17). For the following reasons, the…