Sanders

Sanders v. Mims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20221:20-cv-00634California2,907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP SANDERS, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00634-JLT-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) SECOND SCREENING ORDER GRANTING v. ) PLAINTIFF ONE FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO

AMEND THE COMPLAINT

MARGARET MIMS, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 22) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Phillip Sanders is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed January 3, 2022. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by individuals who are proceeding in forma pauperis. See Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) (per curiam); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fails to state a claim on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.