Griesbach

(PC) Luedtke v. Griesbach

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20221:21-cv-00718California1,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LUEDTKE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00718-TLN-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER v. WILLIAM GRIESBACH; KIRK OBEAR;

HARINE MORENO-TAXMAN; GINA

COLLETTI; ANTHONY ISSI; STANLEY

BOONE; BARBARA MCAULIFFE;

DALE DROZD; SHEILA OBERTO, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff James Luedtke (“Plaintiff”), a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a prisoner civil rights complaint on May 3, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on Plaintiff and contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were due in thirty days. (ECF No. 7.) The findings and recommendations additionally provided a warning-notice to Plaintiff that his continued filings may result in designation as a vexatious litigant and issuance of a filing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.