Bick

(PC) Thompson v. Bick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20222:19-cv-01651California2,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRONE THOMPSON, Case No. 2:19-cv-01651-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

v. ECF No. 24 BICK, et al.,

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR AN

EXTENSION OF TIME

16 ECF No. 31 17 18 Plaintiff Thompson is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in which he alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to treat adequately his chronic pain issues. He has filed a motion to compel defendants to produce several documents. ECF No. 24. Defendants have filed an opposition. ECF No. 25. For the reasons stated below, I will grant plaintiff’s motion to compel. Legal Standards Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37 are designed to facilitate the process of discovery without judicial intervention. To obtain documents or electronically stored information, or to conduct an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.