Doe
Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, individually, and RICHARD No. 2:20-cv-02248-TLN-DMC ROE on behalf of Minor A, Minor B, and Minor C, Plaintiffs, ORDER v. BUTTE COUNTY PROBATION
DEPARTMENT; ROXANNE LARA;
DAWN HOROWITZ-PERSON, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs John Doe (“Doe”) and Richard Roe’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Complaint. (ECF No. 65.) Defendant Dawn Horwitz-Person1 (“Horwitz-Person”) opposes the motion. (ECF No. 66.) Defendant Butte County Probation Department (“Butte County”) and Roxanne Lara (“Lara” or collectively “County Defendants”) separately oppose the motion. (ECF No. 67.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 70.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Complaint. Also pending before the Court are County Defendants’ 26 Defendant refers to herself as “Dawn Horwitz-Person” in her opposition. (ECF No. 66.) Although the…