Wade

Wade v. City of Vacaville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20222:20-cv-01965California2,208 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RICHARD WADE, and SAVANNAH

CHAMPION,

Plaintiffs, No. 2:20-cv-01965-TLN-KJN v.

STEVEN GUNDERSON, RALPH

VALLIMONT, CHRIS LECHUGA, ORDER

JEREMY JOHNSON, WILLIAM

BOEHM, TREVOR CHAMPION,

SABRINA CHAMPION, JACKIE

15 CHAMPION, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18

20 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Steven Gunderson (“Gunderson”), Ralph Vallimont (“Vallimont”), Chris Lechuga (“Lechuga”), Jeremy Johnson (“Johnson”), and William Boehm’s (“Boehm”) (collectively, “City Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiffs Richard Wade (“Wade”) and Savannah Champion (“Savannah”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have filed an opposition. (ECF No. 27.) City Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 29.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS City Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) with leave to amend. 28 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 On March 22, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.