CA Coastkeeper Alliance v. Cosumnes Corp.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALIFORNIA COASTKEEPER No. 2:20-cv-1703 DB
ALLIANCE,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. COSUMNES CORPORATION dba
MURIETA EQUESTRIAN CENTER,
16 Defendant. 18 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. See U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter has been reassigned to the undersigned for all purposes. On February 10, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend along with a proposed second amended complaint. (ECF No. 42.) Defendant filed an opposition on February 25, 2022. (ECF No. 45.) Plaintiff filed a reply on March 4, 2022. (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission that same day. (ECF No. 46.) A pretrial schedule issued in this action on April 5, 2021. (ECF No. 22.) “Once the district court had filed a pretrial scheduling order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 which established a timetable for amending pleadings that rule’s…