(PC) Ruiz v. Northern District of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20222:20-cv-02025California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:20-CV-2025-TLN-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 17, for the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff’s motion is written in Spanish. The Court cannot accept submissions in a language other than English. United States v. Rivera-Rosario, 300 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2002) (“It is clear, to the point of perfect transparency, that federal court proceedings must be conducted in English.”). Sister courts in the Eastern District have reached the same conclusion. Rodriguez v. Ruiz, No. 2:20-cv-1525-JPD P, 2020 WL 5995097, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2020). Courts sitting in other districts have also recognized that submissions in federal court must be in English. Arteaga v. Cinram-Technicolor, No. 3:19-cv-00349, 2020 WL 1905176, at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.