Munoz
Munoz v. Board of Trustees of the CSU
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRANCISCO MUNOZ, No. 2:21–cv–1692–MCE–CKD Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL v. (ECF No. 10) BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. 17 Presently before the court is plaintiff Francisco Munoz’s motion to compel defendant Board of Trustees of the California State University (“CSU” or “defendant”) to furnish responses to his Requests for Production, Set One, and an accompanying request for attorneys’ fees in bringing the motion. (ECF No. 10.) The motion was noticed for hearing before the undersigned on March 16, 2022, under Local Rule 251(e). After reviewing the briefing, the court determines this matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument, see E.D. Cal. L. R. 230(g), and therefore vacates the March 16, 2022, hearing. For the following reasons, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART plaintiff’s motion to compel. //// 27 This discovery matter is before the…