Price

(HC) Griffin v. Price

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20221:21-cv-01507California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEXTER LAWRENCE GRIFFIN, Case No. 1:21-cv-01507-DAD-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

v. (ECF No. 20) BRANDON PRICE, Respondent.

16 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In the petition, Petitioner appears to challenge an August 15, 2008 Sacramento County Superior Court determination that Petitioner is a “sexually violent predator” (“SVP”) within the meaning of California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600, et seq., and his indefinite confinement. (ECF No. 1 at 1, 6).1 On February 14, 2022, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending the petition be dismissed for failure to exhaust state judicial remedies. (ECF No. 19). On February 28, 2022, Petitioner filed the instant motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. (ECF No. 20). The motion is difficult to decipher. Petitioner appears to seek sanctions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.