(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20221:22-cv-00160California780 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00160-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

KEN CLARK, et al., ) ) (ECF No. 11) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Jose Alfredo Suarez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s February 16, 2022 order denying his request for appointment of counsel, filed March 7, 2022. Because leave to file a motion for reconsideration is not necessary, the Court construes Plaintiff’s request as an actual motion for reconsideration. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 60(b), the Court may provide relief “from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.