(SS) Ounkham v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20221:20-cv-01371California2,708 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 LARRY OUNKHAM, Case No. 1:20-cv-01371-EPG Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. SECURITY COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF Nos. 1, 15).

SECURITY,

16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding his application for disability benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff presents the following issues for decision: “1) Whether The ALJ Failed to provide any evidence to support the Residual Function Capacity [(RFC)]; 2) Whether These Failures Were Harmful; and 3) Whether this case should be remanded for payment of benefits or further proceedings.” (ECF No. 15, p. 7). 28 applicable law, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.