Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL GIGENA, No. 2:22-cv-00206-TJN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. DONALD BAKER, Defendant. 16 On February 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On February 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed a supplement to petition for writ of mandate and administrative stay. (ECF No. 4.) The Court construes this filing as Plaintiff’s objections to the findings and recommendations, which have been considered by the Court. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to…