R.S.
R.S. v. County of Stanislaus
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 R.S., a minor, by and through his guardian No. 1:20-cv-01170-DAD-SKO ad litem Jessica Moreno, et al. 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO v. TERMINATE PLAINTIFF JORGE VICENTE 14 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., (Doc. 19) 15 Defendants.
17 On March 8, 2022, the parties filed a “Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Plaintiff Jorge Vicente Without Prejudice,” in which they notify the Court of the dismissal of Plaintiff Jorge Vicente’s claims without prejudice. (Doc. 19.) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for 23 summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). “The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or all of [their] claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1)”…