(PC)Ellis

(PC)Ellis v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20222:21-cv-01635California1,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN F. ELLIS, No. 2:21-cv-1635-WBS-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. BROWN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Screening Standards Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which ///// 26 1 Accordingly, plaintiff’s previously filed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 5) is moot, and the court withdraws its December 7, 2021 findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.