Hansber

Hansber v. Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20221:21-cv-00022California4,435 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAHARA HANSBER, on behalf of ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00022-AWI-BAK (SAB) themselves, all others similarly situated, and ) on behalf of the general public, et al., ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO JOIN Plaintiffs, ) PARTIES ) 14 v. ) (Doc. 33) ) ULTA BEAUTY COSMETICS, LLC, et al., ) [THIRTY-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] ) Defendants. )

On December 17, 2021, Defendant Ulta Beauty filed the instant motion to join staffing agency employers as necessary parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 19(a). (Doc. 33.) Plaintiffs filed their opposition on January 10, 2022 (Doc. 40), and Defendant filed a reply on January 14, 2022. (Doc. 41.) On January 19, 2022, the motion was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for entry of findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. (Doc. 42.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.