(HC) Simpson v. Black

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20221:21-cv-01121California223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} HAROLD ROCHELLE SIMPSON, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01121 JLT EPG (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) CHANGE NAME OF RESPONDENT v. ) || CINDY BLACK, Acting Executive Director of Napa State Hosp.,_ ) ° Respondent. ) Harold Rochelle Simpson is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus. 18 || Respondent reported Simpson “is committed to Napa State Hospital, where Cindy Black is the Actin: 19 || Executive Director.” (Doc. 13 at 1, n.1.) Respondent requests the Court “substitute Cindy Black as 20 || Respondent in this matter.” (/d., citing Brittingham v. United States, 982 F.2d 378, 379 (9th Cir. 21 || 1992).) Based upon the information provided, the Court agrees Cindy Black is the proper Responder 22 || See Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Ortiz-Sandoval v. Gomez, 81 F.3d 891, 894 (9th 23 || Cir. 1996);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.