Watkins
Watkins v. Westin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL W. WATKINS, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01348-JLT-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ CONSTRUED
v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
WILLIAM WESTIN, et al., (ECF No. 43) Defendants.
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
16 17 18 Plaintiff Michael Watkins, proceeding in this matter pro se, initiated this action on April 30, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in Knoxville. (ECF No. 1.) On July 28, 2021, Defendants William Westin, Edward Miliam and Joe Banuelos moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and (3). (ECF No. 11.) On August 26, 2021, the Tennessee Court granted Defendants’ motion and the case was subsequently transferred to the Eastern District of California on September 9, 2021. (ECF Nos. 14, 15, 16.) On September 29, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a “first amended complaint.” …