(PC) Barnes v. Van Ness

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20221:20-cv-00625California2,892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00625-JLT-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND/OR

VAN NESS, COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER BE

GRANTED AND THAT DEFENDANT’S Defendant. REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES BE DENIED (ECF No. 58)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 Antoine Barnes (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on May 1, 2020. (ECF No. 1). This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment sexual harassment claim against defendant Van Ness based on allegations that defendant Van Ness snuck up to Plaintiff’s cell door, and with the help of a tech…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.