Rodriguez

(PC) Bland v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20221:20-cv-00478California3,423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 JOSHUA BLAND, Case No. 1:20-cv-00478-DAD-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ROBERT RODRIGUEZ, et al., ORDERS AND TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE 13 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 64, 83, 88)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS Joshua Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s failure to protect claims against defendants Stark, Jaime, Rodriguez, Garay, Melendrez, Lewis, Isais, and Huckleberry.” (ECF Nos. 14 & 22). On January 5, 2022, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to compel because Plaintiff failed to respond to discovery requests and provided no reason for his failure to do so. (ECF No. 83). The Court also granted Defendants’ request for attorney’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.