Cate
(PC) Rodriguez v. Cate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERICK EDDIE RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 1:21-cv-00898-DAD-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER
M. CATE, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Erick Eddie Rodriguez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 23, 2021, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 21.) Following re-service by mail to a temporary address,1 Plaintiff filed objections on October 19, 2021. (Doc. 22.) On October 27, 2021, District Judge Dale A. Drozd adopted the Findings and Recommendations in full. (Doc. 23.) Specifically, Judge Drozd denied Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered that Plaintiff pay the $402 filing fee within 90 days. (Id. at 2.) More than 90 days have passed, and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee.…