Betancourt
Betancourt v. Total Property Management
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CESAR A. BETANCOURT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00033-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TOTAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
TWENTY-ONE DAYS
Defendant.
15 Plaintiff Cesar A. Betancourt is proceeding pro se in this civil action. (ECF No. 1). Despite the District Judge ordering Plaintiff to pay the $402 filing fee in this case, Plaintiff has failed to do so. (ECF No. 4). Because Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee and comply with a court order, the Court recommends dismissal of this case. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this lawsuit on January 7, 2022, generally alleging that Defendant Total Property Management has violated the “CARES Act” by “push[ing]” his wife to move out of the house in the middle of the pandemic and while she was recovering from a stroke. (ECF No. 1, p. 5). On January 12, 2022, the Court…