(SS) Lloyd v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20222:20-cv-01727California365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENDA LLOYD, Case No. 2:20-cv-01727-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL RESPONSE DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 On June 3, 2021, the court issued a scheduling order requiring plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment within 45 days of the service of the administrative record. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff has not filed a motion. Accordingly, the court will order plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005). Involuntary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.