(HC) Taylor v. Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20222:21-cv-00227California1,803 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THINTINUS N. TAYLOR, No. 2:21-cv-0227 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent. 16 Petitioner filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On October 6, 2021, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. On November 22, 2021, petitioner was ordered to show cause why his failure to oppose the motion should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition, and that the motion be granted. Petitioner filed a response, and on January 26, 2022, petitioner was granted an additional thirty days in which to file an opposition. Thirty days have passed, and petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. As discussed below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.