(PC)Stevenson
(PC)Stevenson v. Holland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 STEVENSON, CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01831-AWI
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CONFIDENTIAL
v. MATERIALS
9 HOLLAND, et al., 10 Defendant.
14 15 Plaintiff Douglas Stevenson, who is proceeding in forma pauperis, Doc. No. 4, filed this action through his counsel, Laurie Wilmore and Meredith Fahn (“Stevenson’s Counsel”), on December 6, 2016, seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law for harms allegedly suffered during his incarceration at the California Correctional Institute (“CCI”) in Tehachapi, California. Doc. No. 1. On February 13, 2022, Stevenson’s Counsel filed an unopposed motion to withdraw on the grounds that they had been terminated and that, in any event, they could no longer provide effective representation to Stevenson. Doc. No. 219. On February 24, 2022, the Court issued an order granting the motion to withdraw on the condition that Stevenson’s Counsel continue to provide representation to Stevenson in connection with the question of…