Ulit

(PC) Castillo v. Ulit

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20221:20-cv-01458California653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER CASTILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01458-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION

v. 14-DAY DEADLINE WAYNE ULIT, et al., Clerk of the Court to Assign a District Judge Defendants.

16 On December 2, 2021, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days. (Doc. 19.) Plaintiff did not file a third amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal. On January 27, 2022, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order. (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff was directed to show cause in writing within 21 days why the action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the Court’s screening order. (Id. at 2.) Alternatively, Plaintiff was afforded another opportunity within which to file a third amended complaint curing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.