(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20221:20-cv-00555California8,084 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ANTONIO MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00555-HBK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER TO REMAND CASE

TO COMMISSIONER2

v. (Doc. No. 14) KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY Defendant. 17 18 19 Jose Antonio Martinez (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of the final decision of the 20 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for 21 supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is 22 currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. 23 (Doc Nos. 14, 15, 17). For the reasons stated, the Court orders this case REMANDED for further 24 administrative proceedings.

1 This action was originally filed against Andrew Shaw in his capacity as the Commissioner of Social Security. (See Doc. No 1 at 1). The Court substituted Kilolo Kijakazi, who has since been appointed the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, as the defendant. See Fed.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.