Brooks

Brooks v. Pressed Juicery, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20222:19-cv-01687California944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VALERIE BROOKS, individually and on No. 2:19-cv-01687-KJM-CKD behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER CONDITIONALLY B Plaintiffs, GRANTING JOINT REQUEST

FOR APPROVAL OF NOTICE

v. AND CLAIM FORMS PRESSED JUICERY, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES to 10, inclusive, Defendants. 17 This issue is before the court on the parties’ joint request for approval of notice and claim form under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. This is the second such request for approval of 20 notice to the class, the first of which the court approved. See generally Mot. for Prelim. Approval, ECF No. 19; Order, ECF No. 24. For the following reasons, the court conditionally grants the parties’ motion. 23 I. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Plaintiff Valerie Brooks alleges that defendant Pressed Juicery, Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.