Webb

(PC) Gibbs v. Webb

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20222:18-cv-02817California527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBART A. GIBBS, No. 2:18-cv-2817 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. WEBB, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2022, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion or filed a statement of no opposition. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. On October 28, 2020 (ECF No. 19), plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.