Thompson

(HC) Remoket v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20222:22-cv-00203California431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAYVIN REMOKET, No. 2:22-cv-0203-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On February 9, 2022, the court found that petitioner had failed to file an in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee ($5.00) required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a). ECF No. 3. Accordingly, the court ordered petitioner to file an in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within 30 days. That order warned petitioner that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. The 30-day period has expired and petitioner has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.