(PS) Nelson Rogers v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS, et. al., No. 2:21-cv-2151-JAM-KJN (PS) Plaintiffs, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 6, 12, 14, 20, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35.) WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 9, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 30), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On February 18, 2022, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 31), and on March 1, 2022, defendants Chase, Schools, and Quality filed responses (ECF Nos. 33, 34, 35). These have been considered by the court. This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 26…