Paviglianti

(PC) Cain v. Paviglianti

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20222:20-cv-01768California249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO LAMONT CAIN, No. 2:20-cv-01768-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. PAVIGLIANTI, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 9, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. ///// ///// ///// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.