(PC) Fontaine v. Shasta County Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20222:21-cv-01688California328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SETH ANTHONY FONTAINE, No. 2:21-cv-01688-JAM-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 16, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. The court presumes that any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.