Chastaine

(PS) Serris v. Chastaine

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20222:22-cv-00434California330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILL JOSEPH SERRIS, No. 2:22-cv-0434-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. SHAUNA CHASTAINE, et al., Defendants. 16 On March 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 7) which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On March 11, 2022, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 8.) This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes its correctness and decides the matter on the applicable law. See Orand v. United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.