Goldberg

Goldberg v. Nadhan, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20222:22-cv-00239California302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JOHN L. SUPPLE (SBN 94582) jsupple@jsupplelaw.com DAYNA F. OLSON (SBN: 327577) dolson@jsupplelaw.com J SUPPLE LAW A Professional Corporation 990 Fifth Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Telephone: (415) 366-5533 Facsimile: (415) 480-6301 6 Attorneys for Defendants NADHAN, INC., dba ORCHARD POST ACUTE CARE (erroneously sued and sued and served as Nadhan, Inc.); SUZETTE CHEATHAM; and MELVIN RIMANDO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 RONALD GOLDBERG by and through his Case No. 2:22-cv-00239-TLN-KJN Successor in Interest, SANDRA GOLDBERG; 13 SANDRA GOLDBERG, RHONDA WASERMAN, Removal from Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS 057376] ANNETTE MCGAHAN, WILLIAM BECKER, and 14 DANIEL BECKER, individually ORDER TO REMAND ACTION TO SUPERIOR COURT AND VACATE Plaintiff, HEARING 16 vs. Complaint Filed: November 3, 2021 Removed: February 3, 2022 NADHAN, INC., NADHAN, INC. dba ORCHARD 18 POST ACUTE CARE, SUZETTE CHEATHAM, Assigned to Hon. Troy L. Nunley, MELVIN RIMANDO and DOES 1-100, Courtroom 2, 15th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.