Foxworthy

(HC) Craig v. Foxworthy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20222:21-cv-01261California864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:21-cv-1261-JAM-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

FOXWORTHY, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner commenced this action while confined to a county jail as a pretrial detainee. ECF No. 1 at 2. He proceeds without counsel and seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that he is being “malicious[ly]” prosecuted and that his conditions of confinement are unlawful. ECF No. 1 at 3, 4. As discussed below, the court will recommend that the petition be dismissed. See Rule 4, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases (requiring summary dismissal of habeas petition if, upon initial review by a judge, it plainly appears “that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court”). ///// ///// 26 1 Petitioner also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 10. That request is granted and the February 9, 2022 findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.