A.H.

A.H. v. Sacramento County Dept. Child, Family and Adult Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20222:21-cv-00690California116 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAR 17 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

In re: A.H., a minor; et al. No. 22-70019

______________________________ D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00690-KJM-JDP A.H., a minor; et al., Eastern District of California, Sacramento Petitioners,

ORDER

v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO,

Respondent,

ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT; et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

Before: TASHIMA, FRIEDLAND, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

DENIED.