Faggianelli

(PC) Hash v. Faggianelli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20222:17-cv-01721California3,805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAWRENCE GEORGE HASH, No. 2:17-cv-1721 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and T. RALLOS, et al., FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court are defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 44), as well as plaintiff’s motion for court intervention or discovery (ECF No. 50) and motion for a copy of the Local Rules (ECF No. 51). I. Motion to Revoke Plaintiff’s In Forma Pauperis Status Defendants argue that plaintiff has accrued at least three strikes, has not alleged that he was in imminent danger at the time the complaint was filed, and is therefore barred from proceeding with this case until he pays the filing fee in full. ECF No. 44 at 4-7. They also argue that plaintiff is not indigent, has intentionally concealed significant funds, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.