Abbott

Abbott v. State Farm General Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20222:19-cv-00100California4,576 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER AND KIMBERLEE ABBOTT, No. 2:19-cv-00100-KJM-DB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs Roger and Kimberlee Abbott bring this case after defendant State Farm denied the insurance claim for plaintiffs’ allegedly stolen Ginger Rogers memorabilia collection. Plaintiffs bring two claims: 1) breach of contract and 2) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Defendant now moves for summary judgment on both claims and, alternatively, for partial summary judgment on plaintiffs’ second claim. For the following reasons, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND The court derives the following facts from plaintiffs’ complaint, both parties’ statements of undisputed facts, the parties’ responses to those statements, evidence cited in those statements and the court’s review of the record. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1; Def.’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (Def.’s SUF), ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.