Bird

(PC) Cunningham v. Bird

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20221:22-cv-00306California794 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYSHUN CUNNINGHAM, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00306-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

BIRD, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ) PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED ) ) (ECF No. 3) )

Plaintiff Rayshun Cunningham is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on March 16, 2022, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. I. LEGAL STANDARD 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to bring a civil action “without prepayment of fees or security thereof” if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that demonstrates the plaintiff's “is unable to pay such fees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.