Doe

Doe v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20221:21-cv-01103California644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JANE DOE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01103-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO EITHER

FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, MOTION TO

v. FILE PSEUDONYMOUS PLEADINGS, OR

PARTIES TO FILE STATUS REPORT

DERRAL ADAMS, et al.,

THREE-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Jane Doe initiated this action on July 20, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) The Court repeatedly reminded the parties to address the need for a motion to file pseudonymous pleadings in the joint scheduling report. (ECF Nos. 9; 11; 21 at 3 n.1 (“The parties should be prepared to address this issue, and be prepared to set a filing date and briefing schedule for such motion, if opposed, or file an unopposed motion that satisfies the applicable legal standards. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a); Doe v. Kamehameha Schools (“Kamehameha Schools”), 596 F.3d 1036, 1042 (9th Cir. 2010); Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp. (“Advanced Textile Corp.”), 214 F.3d 1058, 1067 (9th Cir. 2000)”); 38 at 1 n.1.) Nonetheless, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.