Vasquez

(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20221:19-cv-00367California1,714 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00367-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE REQUEST FOR

SUBPOENAS

VASQUEZ, et al., Defendants. (Doc. 90) 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION This matter is scheduled for an evidentiary hearing on April 19, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. (Doc. 84.) The evidentiary hearing involves “material disputes of fact … regarding whether administrative remedies were available to Plaintiff … [and] an evidentiary hearing is necessary to resolve the disputes.” (Doc. 72.) On March 16, 2022, an Order & Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum to produce Plaintiff to appear by Zoom video conference at the evidentiary hearing was issued. (Doc. 92.) // // // On March 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion or request for subpoenas. (Doc. 90.) Plaintiff states he is “requesting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.