Aung

(PC) Murray v. Aung

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20222:19-cv-02114California551 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY MURRAY, No. 2:19-cv-2114 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN, et al, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion for injunctive relief. ECF No. 50. He requests that the court order follow-up treatment with an off-site pain specialist to manage the high levels of pain he experiences from a brain tumor, because defendants are ignoring his need for treatment. Id. “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest.” Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008) (citations omitted). Furthermore, mandatory preliminary injunctions like plaintiff seeks,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.