Docanto

(PC) Harris v. Docanto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20221:20-cv-00042California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEVANTE B. HARRIS, 1:20-cv-00042-DAD-GSA-PC

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 13 vs. (ECF No. 24.)

M. DOLANTO, and

15 Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE,

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT’S ORDER

18 (ECF No. 23.)

25 Devante B. Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 17, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for a thirty- day extension of time to file his Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 24.) “When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1). In support of his motion for extension of time, Plaintiff asserts that he has not filed his Second Amended Complaint because he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.