(PC) Maestas v. RCCC Medical Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20222:21-cv-01419California3,748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RANDY V. MAESTAS, No. 2:21-cv-1419 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RCCC MEDICAL STAFF, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff, a state inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action appears to concern medical treatment plaintiff received while located in the custody of the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department at Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center (“RCCC”). Before the court is plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 10) and plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for screening (ECF No. 6). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s FAC will be dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 10.) Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.