Adams
(HC) Craig v. Adams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:21-cv-1308 KJM CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND ADAMS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a Napa State Hospital detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has paid the filing fee. On March 8, 2022, the court recommended that this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to update his address. A review of the record before the court including the objections filed by petitioner on March 16, 2022, reveals petitioner did keep the court apprised of his address. Accordingly, the court’s March 8, 2022 findings and recommendations will be vacated. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted…