Enborg

Enborg v. Ethicon, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20222:20-cv-02477California7,997 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 CASE NO. 2:20-cv-02477-AWI-BAK TERRI ENBORG, et al.

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

Plaintiff, TO EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINIONS

AND TESTIMONY

v.

ETHICON, INC., et al.,

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 107, 108, 109 & 110) 13

17 Plaintiff Terri Enborg has brought motions to exclude certain opinions and testimony offered by experts retained by Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc. (together, “Defendants” or “Ethicon”). Doc. Nos. 107, 108, 109 and 110. The motions are fully briefed and have been deemed suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below the motions will be granted in part and denied in part. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 This case began as part of MDL No. 2327, In re Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation, Case No. 2:13-cv-18734 (S.D. W. Va.), before the Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin in the Southern District of West Virginia (the “MDL Court”), as one of thousands of cases involving 27 1 Additional background relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.