Johnson v. Pick 6 Tahoe LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20222:19-cv-02186California1,006 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN JOHNSON, No. 2:19-cv-2186 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER PICK 6 TAHOE LLC, Defendant. 16 The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). (ECF No. 20.) On January 18, 2022, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment and request to amend the scheduling order. (ECF No. 23.) After defendant failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition, in violation of Local Rule 230(c), the Court issued defendant an order to show cause. (ECF No. 26.) The order directed defense counsel to address why defense counsel should not be personally sanctioned for their conduct. (Id. at 2.) The order also continued the hearing of plaintiff’s motion to March 25, 2022. (Id.) On February 22, 2022, defense counsel Morgan Mack filed a declaration as a response to the order to show case. (ECF No. 26.) Review of that declaration finds that defense counsel 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.