Petras
(PC) Williams v. Petras
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THEAUDRA CONRAD WILLIAMS, No. 2:19-cv-0605 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER OGNJEN PETRAS, Defendants. 16 On December 30, 2021, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendants served that motion to plaintiff’s address of record on January 3, 2022. (ECF No. 51 at 2.) To date, plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion....” Id. In an order signed on January 29, 2021 and filed on February 1, 2021, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 37 at 6.) See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc); Klingele v. Eikenberry,…