Gipson

(PC) Lewis v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20221:20-cv-00574California322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARONTA TYRONE LEWIS, Case No. 1:20cv574-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO STRIKE

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF STIPULATION

v. (Doc. No. 144) CONNNIE GIPSON, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 On March 18, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of stipulation. (Doc. No. 144). Plaintiff states the parties stipulate to various facts and/or claims concerning this action. (Id. at 1-2) (stating parties agree government insurance claim was timely filed, stipulation for certain witnesses to appear). Significantly, only Plaintiff’s signature is on the stipulation. (See generally Id. at 5). Local Rule 143 requires that a stipulation must be “in writing, signed by all attorneys or pro se parties who have appeared in the action and are affected by the stipulation . . . .” L.R. 143(a)(1). “Stipulations not in conformity with these requirement will not be recognized unless necessary to prevent manifest injustice.” (Id.); see also Johnson v. Oropeza, Case No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.